<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344</id><updated>2010-03-17T14:11:04.116Z</updated><title type='text'>Corizon Blog</title><subtitle type='html'>This blog brings together comment and thoughts from the team at Corizon, providers of robust, scalable enterprise mashup software that brings SOA all the way to the user interface</subtitle><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.corizon.com/atom.xml'/><author><name>Corizon Blog-team</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03191784751419638980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>52</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-514306366597165955</id><published>2010-03-17T14:04:00.004Z</published><updated>2010-03-17T14:11:04.126Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social CRM'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><title type='text'>Thoughts from Gartner CRM Summit</title><summary type='text'>We’ve enjoyed an interesting first day at the Gartner CRM Summit in London.Gartner’s overall assessment is that social CRM - community in customer service, social sales techniques and social media marketing -  will be the most hyped segment of the CRM market (surprise!), and will see the most growth.  However this will (surprise again!) still not be a major spending area - traditional salesforce </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=514306366597165955' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/514306366597165955'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/514306366597165955'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/03/thoughts-from-gartner-crm-summit.html' title='Thoughts from Gartner CRM Summit'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-7208863021207078643</id><published>2010-03-09T16:58:00.005Z</published><updated>2010-03-10T17:35:42.095Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='application development'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='user experience'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Lean Software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SOA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='business alignment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Web services'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='architecture'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='customer experience'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><title type='text'>Improving the user experience</title><summary type='text'>Integration technology has been on a journey that has radically improved agility and reduced TCO.  It has moved from a manual craft to something more modular, reusable and business focused:           • Hiding complexity behind well defined and open interfaces that encourage reuse and sharing• Replacing point to point with many to many• Minimising the custom coding required for any particular </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=7208863021207078643' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/7208863021207078643'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/7208863021207078643'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/03/improving-user-experience.html' title='Improving the user experience'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-6193069571554980284</id><published>2010-02-12T12:32:00.010Z</published><updated>2010-02-12T13:07:19.899Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Lean Software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise Mashups'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='business alignment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='customization'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise 2.0'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERP application'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CIO'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='customer experience'/><title type='text'>iPad: a return to web 1.0?</title><summary type='text'>Interesting comments from Jay Rosen on the iPad and what it says about where Apple think the Internet is going:  "In a way it is taking us back in web time to the read only web. We had advanced from web 1.0 to web 2.0 where users are producers. That is what YouTube is about, and blogging and social media. The users are producers of some of the most popular content...it seems to be restoring </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=6193069571554980284' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6193069571554980284'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6193069571554980284'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/02/ipad-return-to-web-10.html' title='iPad: a return to web 1.0?'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-6670139975670912329</id><published>2010-02-05T10:49:00.006Z</published><updated>2010-02-05T13:37:15.273Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktops'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>The Agent Desktop – the elephant in the contact centre?</title><summary type='text'>A recent paper from Gartner (Top Business Processes for Customer Service, 2010 to 2012 - subscription required) about customer service process priorities adds to my impression that the agent desktop - and in particular the complexities of using the applications on it - is in danger of being the “elephant in the room” when improving service delivery in the contact centre.The report discusses the </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=6670139975670912329' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6670139975670912329'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6670139975670912329'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/02/agent-desktop-elephant-in-contact.html' title='The Agent Desktop – the elephant in the contact centre?'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-6136262182459122666</id><published>2010-01-29T06:18:00.006Z</published><updated>2010-01-29T09:22:27.086Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Sabio'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise Mashups'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='operations'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='customer experience'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktops'/><title type='text'>Ambitions to Perform</title><summary type='text'>I attended an excellent event delivered by Sabio, one of our strategic partners, last week. Focused around the Sabio Best in Class benchmarking framework called Insight, the agenda covered individual areas of focus for Contact Centres each illustrated perfectly by a case study. Targeted at Operations Directors, IT and Senior Contact Centre Management, the event covered Demand Management, </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=6136262182459122666' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6136262182459122666'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6136262182459122666'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/01/ambitions-to-perform.html' title='Ambitions to Perform'/><author><name>Emma Chablo</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02907425384437577640</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07096281086294588515'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-1377297172518335523</id><published>2010-01-22T08:52:00.004Z</published><updated>2010-01-22T09:03:16.950Z</updated><title type='text'>“Obvious Mashups?”</title><summary type='text'>I have been reading Jack Trout's "In Search of the Obvious, the antidote for today's marketing mess". Trout's view is that to succeed in differentiating your offering, you need to look for 'obvious solutions' that will set your products apart from your competitors in a way that is equally obvious to your customers. To help in 'identifying the obvious (sic)', he devised 5 tests, the tests of </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=1377297172518335523' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1377297172518335523'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1377297172518335523'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/01/obvious-mashups.html' title='“Obvious Mashups?”'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-3767024964966363669</id><published>2010-01-20T11:04:00.006Z</published><updated>2010-01-20T12:12:28.484Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Peter Evans-Greenwood'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SOA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Headshift'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise 2.0'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='data silos'/><title type='text'>The Impact of Data Ubiquity</title><summary type='text'>Part 2 This blog post is co-written with Lee Provoost from the social business consulting firm Headshift and started over a bowl of porridgeThe end-user of your product doesn't care what kind of data silos are laying underneath your IT system. They just want the information they need to do their work, but very importantly: taking in account the context of the work! Put yourself in the consumer’s </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=3767024964966363669' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3767024964966363669'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3767024964966363669'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/01/impact-of-data-ubiquity_20.html' title='The Impact of Data Ubiquity'/><author><name>Emma Chablo</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02907425384437577640</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07096281086294588515'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-8619833007527906540</id><published>2010-01-14T15:36:00.012Z</published><updated>2010-01-15T11:00:40.269Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='knowledge worker'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Headshift'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='application interface'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise 2.0'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='data silos'/><title type='text'>Data Ubiquity Threatening Usefulness of Enterprise 2.0</title><summary type='text'>This blog post is co-written with Lee Provoost from the social business consulting firm Headshift and started over a bowl of porridgePart 1...."Content and data are everywhere. People are creating and curating content like never before. As data storage becomes cheaper, businesses are storing,archiving, and mining more data than previously possible. The increasing openness of APIs and data </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=8619833007527906540' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8619833007527906540'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8619833007527906540'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2010/01/data-ubiquity-threatening-usefulness-of.html' title='Data Ubiquity Threatening Usefulness of Enterprise 2.0'/><author><name>Emma Chablo</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02907425384437577640</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='07096281086294588515'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-1139266998613298806</id><published>2009-12-21T09:12:00.002Z</published><updated>2009-12-21T10:14:34.564Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='process mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>Corizon introduction video</title><summary type='text'>We've created a new video that provides an introduction to Corizon enterprise mashups and their use.Please check it out and let us know what you think.</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=1139266998613298806' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1139266998613298806'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1139266998613298806'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/12/corizon-introduction-video.html' title='Corizon introduction video'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-2110045107144551113</id><published>2009-12-11T10:25:00.001Z</published><updated>2009-12-11T10:27:43.365Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>Recognition</title><summary type='text'>It’s always good to be recognized, and Corizon’s inclusion in the top 10 Contact Center Technologies from Call Center Helper magazine is great feedback directly from the market.  It is especially significant when you remember how varied and complex  the contact center technology industry is.This provides another piece of tangible evidence of two changes that we’ve been seeing all year: Fixing the</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=2110045107144551113' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/2110045107144551113'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/2110045107144551113'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/12/recognition.html' title='Recognition'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-4154083747390998694</id><published>2009-12-08T20:14:00.006Z</published><updated>2009-12-08T20:33:28.580Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='application development'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='business alignment'/><title type='text'>IT becoming more important to improve business efficiencies according to McKinsey survey</title><summary type='text'>In a recent global survey of CIO, CTOs as well as non IT executives, McKinsey found that, during the recession, IT has become more important to improving business efficiencies. 39% of those surveyed now see  the primary role of IT to improve business efficiency vs 31% a year ago. This bodes well for software and other IT products focused on improving business processes, making people more </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=4154083747390998694' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/4154083747390998694'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/4154083747390998694'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/12/it-becoming-more-important-to-improve.html' title='IT becoming more important to improve business efficiencies according to McKinsey survey'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-431218467580896428</id><published>2009-12-04T16:51:00.004Z</published><updated>2009-12-04T16:57:02.521Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='process mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>Allowing for the human element</title><summary type='text'>When people must work with business applications and processes, it seems there is continual need to strike a balance between completely rigid process definition (when people become pure input / output devices) and completely ad hoc behaviour (no repeatability, management etc.).  This is one of the themes being taken up in the BPM world at the moment. For example as Jim Sinur recently pointed out:</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=431218467580896428' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/431218467580896428'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/431218467580896428'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/12/allowing-for-human-element.html' title='Allowing for the human element'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-1897962114460703108</id><published>2009-11-27T12:12:00.002Z</published><updated>2009-11-27T12:21:00.344Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>The futility of call centre coaching (or why not every attempt to cure the same symptoms is equal)</title><summary type='text'>The first part of the title isn’t original, but it’s certainly attention grabbing!  It comes from an article by Denis Adsit.  Apart from its  title, I found it interesting because it has implications for the choices that call centre managers have to make when they are looking to improve performance.  Anybody wanting to improve call handling time or first call resolution (to take but two common </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=1897962114460703108' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1897962114460703108'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1897962114460703108'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/11/futility-of-call-centre-coaching-or-why.html' title='The futility of call centre coaching (or why not every attempt to cure the same symptoms is equal)'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-3837422554499539033</id><published>2009-11-24T18:24:00.017Z</published><updated>2009-11-25T10:16:35.521Z</updated><title type='text'>Integrating applications for people</title><summary type='text'>Dale Vile, from Freeform Dynamics, has written an interesting article discussing whether packaged applications are becoming less relevant: Whether it’s SOA purists telling us that we’ll all be self-assembling solutions from components, enthusiasts of modern development environments wanting to build everything from scratch, or the SaaS evangelists saying it’s all going to go into the cloud anyway,</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=3837422554499539033' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3837422554499539033'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3837422554499539033'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/11/integrating-applications-for-people.html' title='Integrating applications for people'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-8305060011385971492</id><published>2009-11-19T16:37:00.007Z</published><updated>2009-11-19T17:23:38.648Z</updated><title type='text'>Billions of dollars lost to poor customer service</title><summary type='text'>Interesting research from Genesys has just been published and is given a good write up in MyCustomer.com by Stuart Lauchlan. First, I must say they deserve ‘la Palme d’Or’ for the highest number one can find in a customer service press release: $338.5bn!  Having said that, I think it is interesting to quantify the actual costs resulting from underperforming customer service in this way. Where do </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=8305060011385971492' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8305060011385971492'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8305060011385971492'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/11/billions-of-dollars-lost-to-poor.html' title='Billions of dollars lost to poor customer service'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-3592880178212420713</id><published>2009-11-12T17:46:00.010Z</published><updated>2009-11-12T18:03:40.609Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='application development'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Lean Software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mashup patterns'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='process mashup'/><title type='text'>Comment on "Enterprise Mashups in Transition"</title><summary type='text'>Anthony Bradley from Gartner provided some interesting views on how he sees the enterprise mashup market developing this week in his blog posting: Enterprise Mashups in Major Transition. The transition he has identified is chiefly concerned with a shift in the use cases he is seeing that drive demand.  As Anthony says:  Just about everyone, including me was talking about enterprise mashups as a </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=3592880178212420713' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3592880178212420713'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/3592880178212420713'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/11/comment-on-enterprise-mashups-in.html' title='Comment on &quot;Enterprise Mashups in Transition&quot;'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-2014412376444281527</id><published>2009-11-03T17:30:00.003Z</published><updated>2009-11-03T17:48:58.278Z</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CTI'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><title type='text'>Why are contact centre desktops so broken - part 2</title><summary type='text'>This posting is the second part of my colleague Toby Baker's observations based on his work with contact centres and their desktop integration problems.My last blog asked why contact centre desktops are so broken, and tried to explain why. This one suggests what we could do about it.Let’s re-cap – the main problems are:There are too many apps on the desktop. The average is 6, I have seen 60.The </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=2014412376444281527' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/2014412376444281527'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/2014412376444281527'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/11/why-are-contact-centre-desktops-so.html' title='Why are contact centre desktops so broken - part 2'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-593921837301992587</id><published>2009-10-20T09:08:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-20T09:15:56.371+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='call center'/><title type='text'>Why are contact centre desktops so broken?</title><summary type='text'>My colleague, Toby Baker has created this guest posting based on his observations from working with Corizon's customers and partners applying enterprise mashups to integration problems in contact centres.I spend a lot of time in contact centres, analyzing applications in use on the desktop, and see the same challenges and issues again and again. This is my top ten:Too many applications, each with</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=593921837301992587' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/593921837301992587'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/593921837301992587'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/10/why-are-contact-centre-desktops-so.html' title='Why are contact centre desktops so broken?'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-7213195189810676247</id><published>2009-10-16T15:15:00.018+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-16T15:48:13.096+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social CRM'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='ERP application'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CIO'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Oracle'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='#oow09'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT strategy'/><title type='text'>Quick thoughts from Oracle OpenWorld</title><summary type='text'>Just come back from Oracle Open World 2009, where the atmosphere was very different from last year: the key focus was on making things works with a lot less hype. Most of the Oracle keynotes I attended insisted, demo after demo, on the progress made in integrating different applications from the portfolio with fusion middleware. The CRM team did a great job in demonstrating new features and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=7213195189810676247' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/7213195189810676247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/7213195189810676247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/10/quick-thoughts-from-oracle-openworld.html' title='Quick thoughts from Oracle OpenWorld'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-1797954927748114192</id><published>2009-10-11T19:57:00.008+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-11T20:08:14.854+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='application development'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Lean Software'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Forrester'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='#BTF09'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='business alignment'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Enterprise applications'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CIO'/><title type='text'>Thoughts on Forrester Business Technology conference: lean times and enterprise mashups</title><summary type='text'>Last week David and I attended the Forrester Business Technology Forum in Chicago. The main  theme of the conference was adopting “lean” approaches to IT – which seems a particularly appropriate term for the lean times we find ourselves in.  The lean concept applies across the full range of activities performed by an IT department, but I was particularly struck by the discussion on its  use in </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=1797954927748114192' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1797954927748114192'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1797954927748114192'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/10/thoughts-on-forrester-business.html' title='Thoughts on Forrester Business Technology conference: lean times and enterprise mashups'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-5454717817036562779</id><published>2009-10-08T14:58:00.014+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-08T18:10:55.667+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Big Shift'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><title type='text'>The contact centre dilemna</title><summary type='text'>Recent studies have highlighted the current dilemma  most companies have with contact centres:  they are both critical in maximising customer value and considered poor  in meeting customer expectations. A YouGov survey conducted in the UK showed that phone and email were by a significant margin the most likely channels used by customers to contact a company for customer service (75% and 70% </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=5454717817036562779' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/5454717817036562779'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/5454717817036562779'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/10/contact-centre-dilemna.html' title='The contact centre dilemna'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-8619754264567360835</id><published>2009-09-17T17:08:00.009+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T15:27:16.998+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SOA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='agent desktop'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Siebel'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='process mashup'/><title type='text'>Mashup solution patterns</title><summary type='text'>Enterprise mashups transform the way organisations combine IT applications to make people and processes more effective. However, in common with most new ideas, if they remain an abstract concept, or if people form preconceptions based on isolated examples (such as the ubiquitous map based mashup), then those who stand to benefit most may find it hard to get a feel for their power or relevance. In</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=8619754264567360835' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8619754264567360835'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8619754264567360835'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/09/mashup-solution-patterns.html' title='Mashup solution patterns'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-1101640083225403897</id><published>2009-08-07T09:12:00.008+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T15:34:00.443+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre agents'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='social CRM'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='contact centre'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Big Shift'/><title type='text'>How do contact centres adapt to the Big Shift?</title><summary type='text'>I have just experienced two very different contact centre interactions. In the first, the contact centre agent was able to address my questions and resolve my issue in a personable dialogue, making decisions along the way and accessing information easily and rapidly to make these decisions. The result was successful and my perception of the company enhanced.  In fact, this was a better experience</summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=1101640083225403897' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1101640083225403897'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/1101640083225403897'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/08/how-do-contact-centres-adapt-to-big.html' title='How do contact centres adapt to the Big Shift?'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-6850382346676840627</id><published>2009-07-29T10:19:00.012+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-29T10:47:04.533+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='IT strategy'/><title type='text'>Making BrITain Great</title><summary type='text'>Micro Focus have just launched an interesting and needed campaign to promote the technology sector in the UK, which I fully support (here). The manifesto makes five directional recommendations for fiscal, entrepreneurial and academic action to promote a more vibrant and stronger technology sector:1. Increase the availability of world-class technology talent in the UK;2. Harness the expertise and </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=6850382346676840627' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6850382346676840627'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/6850382346676840627'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/07/making-britain-great.html' title='Making BrITain Great'/><author><name>Eric Guilloteau</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/09528498198900149480</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='00211499038187261491'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7091178102090990344.post-8774592307230509235</id><published>2009-07-23T09:26:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T15:35:53.606+01:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='SOA'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='enterprise mashup'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Web services'/><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='CRM application'/><title type='text'>Enterprise mashups – kick-starting adoption</title><summary type='text'>Recent blogs from the worlds of enterprise mashups and CRM have reinforced my impression that a lot of people are struggling with the dilemma of how to move to the flexible IT and business architectures they know they need for future success when the investment environment is focused on short term returns.

A posting by Susan Bouchard at Cisco kicked off a discussion that led to Stefan Andreasen </summary><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7091178102090990344&amp;postID=8774592307230509235' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8774592307230509235'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7091178102090990344/posts/default/8774592307230509235'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.corizon.com/2009/07/enterprise-mashups-kick-starting.html' title='Enterprise mashups – kick-starting adoption'/><author><name>David Davies</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07029631643901216616</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='02706782764431487597'/></author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></entry></feed>